Suwon District Court 2007Guhap2495 (Law No. 8.13, 2008)

National High Court Decision 2006J3260 ( December 20, 2006)

If the company is not actually managed, it shall not be allowed to admit the name of the title holder and to dispose of it.

The representative who is subject to the bonus disposition shall be interpreted strictly and strictly, and since he is the representative who actually runs the company, even if he is registered in the corporate register, if he does not actually operate the company, his income shall not be reverted to the name of the representative director.

The contents of the decision shall be the same as attached.

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of KRW 150,040,905 on January 1, 2006 against the Plaintiff shall be revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is citing this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.