logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.07.20 2017고단1509
산업안전보건법위반
Text

Defendant

A and B Co., Ltd. shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

Defendant

A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation established around December 19, 197, with a place of business in Silti City, with 365 full-time workers who run the business of manufacturing, processing, and selling non-ferrous metals. Defendant A is the representative director of the corporation B, who is in charge of the business of safety and health of its employees. Defendant C is the head of the production headquarters in Silti City, who is in charge of the management of the responsibility for safety and health of on-site workers at the places of business in B, a corporation located in Silti City, and victim H(47 years old) is a corporation as the head of B production team.

1. Defendant A

(a) Any business owner who violates the Industrial Safety and Health Act due to a death incident shall take necessary measures to prevent any danger caused by machines, apparatus, and other equipment in running his/her business, and for this purpose, the relevant business owner shall, if he/she is likely to cause danger to workers at the time of commencing the operation of machines, check in advance necessary matters, such as placement, education, work methods, protective devices, etc., and take necessary measures to prevent any danger, and, if any, the operation of the relevant machines is likely to cause danger to workers at the time of performing the maintenance, cleaning, cleaning, oil supply, inspection, repair, replacement, or adjustment work of small machinery, transportation machinery, construction machinery, and construction machinery, and other similar work, the operation of the relevant machinery shall be suspended

Nevertheless, around August 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) placed the victim of a person who works in office in accordance with the partial strike of a trade union at the above B’s workplace in substitution for the production site and did not take necessary measures such as education, etc.; and (b) had the victim do not stop the operation of pressure-generating devices.

As a result, the Defendant was on August 6, 2016 at the above B places of business around 10:15, when the victim did not stop the operation of the machinery that the victim did not operate.

arrow