logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.11.16 2017고단543
산업안전보건법위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B Co., Ltd. is a business owner who runs the manufacturing industry of Aluminium in South-dong, South-dong, Nam-gu, and Defendant A is a person in charge of safety management of workers belonging to the above B Co., Ltd.

1. Defendant A

(a) A business owner involved in a serious accident shall ensure that his/her workers use the relevant machinery, protective devices, etc. after maintaining the machinery or protective devices without fail, and until the maintenance is completed, he/she shall prohibit the use of the relevant machinery, protective devices, etc., and shall stop the operation of the relevant machinery, if his/her workers are likely to be in danger at the time of maintaining the machinery, transportation machinery, transportation machinery, repair, replacement or adjustment work or other similar work, and shall check in advance necessary matters, such as placement, education, work methods, protective devices, etc., if there is a concern that the workers might be in danger at the time of commencing the operation of the machinery, and shall take necessary measures to prevent danger after checking in advance necessary matters, such as placement, education, work methods, protective devices, etc., and install a wheel lick, sound bridge, etc., on the part of the machinery engine, which is likely to be in danger by workers, such as a worker, such as

Nevertheless, Defendant A fails to take measures such as placement of workers at the time of the air condition of the air condition of the control tower valves and the control tower connected to the control line, the operation of the control line maintenance, the operation of the control line maintenance, the operation of the control line maintenance, and the placement of pressure air conditioners at the time of the operation of pressure air conditioners and the operation of the control line, and the installation of shocks at the time of pressure exit and the control line after the pressure exit process was completed on June 7, 2016. While the pressure exit process was accepted, the victim E irrelevant to the repair work moves to the control line on his own after the pressure exit. The indictment is to be submitted to the control unit for the failure of the control line with the control line after the pressure exit process was completed.

arrow