A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

The defendant operates the "D Office" in Osan-si C under the name of the defendant-friendly E.

On November 9, 2007, the Defendant entered into a design service contract with G (20,000,000 won per square day) upon receiving a request from G, which purchased land equivalent to F 3,627 square meters, to obtain permission, etc. to establish factories on the above land, and upon receiving a request from G to request for a different administrative procedure, the Defendant entered into a design service contract with G and price of KRW 72,00,000 on the same day.

On the other hand, on November 9, 2007, G paid I the purchase price of KRW 2,720,000 to H, a real estate broker, and purchased the above land, and subsequently completed the registration of ownership transfer in the J-based corporation, G, which made the beneficiary G. G planned to fill out the above land amounting to KRW 1,00,00, and planned to use it as a factory site. The remaining land was planned to build and resell the site where a factory can be located with permission for development activities, and H was in a state of investment of KRW 20,000 and KRW 40,000.

G obtained permission from the competent authority for development activities on the construction of factories and the construction of neighborhood living facilities in the name of K, L and H, including G himself, from August 2009 to December 3, 2009, with respect to the instant land in the name of the N who intends to operate a factory from the land of G, and from the land of G, G filed an application for permission from the competent authority for development activities on the construction of factories and the construction of neighborhood living facilities. Although all public charges, such as the farmland diversion charges in an amount equivalent to KRW 120 million necessary therefor, as he/she failed to repay the interest on the loan, the Y-nam Agricultural Cooperative, which is the mortgagee of the said land, filed

7. The Suwon District CourtO rendered a decision to commence the auction on the above land.

On November 2011, the Defendant is aware by K that “The land owned by the G is immediately entering the third auction, and the design cost that A did not receive from the husband and wife is about KRW 50 million.

A was paid in the name of G, M, N, or L, including A B.