beta
Text
Defendant
A and C Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, each of them shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.
except that this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
D around November 9, 2007, Defendant C, a real estate broker, paid the purchase price of KRW 2.72 million to H, and purchased the land equivalent to KRW 3627,00,000,000 from 1.7 billion to 3.627, the beneficiary was Defendant D and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of J. D. Defendant D made part of the above land filled up and used it as a factory site by having Defendant B, who operated the K in the dispute settlement bank. Defendant D planned to build and resell the remainder of the above land as a site where the factory can be located after obtaining permission for development activities. Defendant C knew of that project, and Defendant C invested the amount of KRW 20,000 and KRW 40,000,000.
Defendant
D A. From August 2009 to December 3, 2009, Defendant A, L and C, including Defendant D, filed an application for development activities on the construction of a factory and the construction of a neighborhood living facility in the name of Defendant D, and under the name of Defendant D, and under the name of N that was trying to operate a factory in the land of Defendant D, and all public charges, including charges for the diversion of farmland equivalent to KRW 120 million necessary therefor, were paid. However, the EF, a mortgagee of the said land, filed an application for voluntary auction on June 3, 201, and the same month were the same month.
7. The Suwon District CourtO rendered a decision to commence the auction on the above land.
From September to October 201, Defendant D, in collusion with Defendant C and Defendant A, in order to recover the investment amount, had Defendant B and Q who operated K, which is a banking construction business operator, report the lien by withdrawing the false amount of the claim with respect to the construction cost and the civil engineering design service cost, etc., and collected the investment amount, delayed the successful bid by a failed bid, and neglected to compensate for damages caused by sale to a third party, etc.
1. Defendant D, who committed a crime interfering with auction with Defendant D, A and C’s Q.