A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor on November 30, 2004 for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Daejeon District Court on January 24, 2008, three years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the same court on January 24, 2008, and four or more years of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime at the Daejeon District Court on September 1, 201, and on April 27, 2015, the execution of the above punishment was completed and is currently under repeated period.

[2] On March 2, 2017, between around 19:11 and around 19:36, the Defendant intruded into the victim’s house at the victim’s house A Dong 101, Yasan-si, Jeollabuk-do, Jeollabuk-do, and through unlocked kitchen kitchen windows, and went to the victim’s house at the victim’s house at the same time, with 1,4 million won at the victim’s market price located in the front line, which is the victim’s house in which the inside and the margin is located, 1,18K posts at one,1,1,1,1,1,1,18 K-si-si, 18K-si, and 1,18 K-si-si, and 1,18 K-si-si, and 1,18 K-si’s 1,18 K-si 1,8 K-si 1,14,14.

As a result, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment more than three times due to larceny, etc., and again intruded into the victim's residence at night during the repeated crime period, and stolen the victim's property worth KRW 18.1 million in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to E and D;

1.The investigation report (in the vicinity of the site ctv investigation);

25. Reporting in advance on the place of crime;

1. A previous conviction in a criminal trial: He/she shall be based on evidence of probative value so that he/she can have a judge's conviction that the facts charged are true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt in a criminal trial, such as inquiry about criminal history, investigation report (the same criminal record, court rulings and confinement status of a suspect);

The term "reasonable doubt" refers to any doubt or incompetence.