(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.04.01 2014고단147

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.04.01 2014고단147

사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 24, 2008, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., and the Act on Promotion of the Game Industry from around October 24, 2008 to around February 25, 2008, changed the game site on D2 stories so that speculation may be promoted, allowing customers to use the game work “noiss” without a rating, and then exchanged the remainder after deducting 10% of commission fees from the points obtained through the use of the said game work.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified to customers for use, exchanged the result of tangible or intangible obtained through the use of game products, and conducted speculative acts by using speculative recreation organizations.

2. On October 25, 2008, the Defendant issued a false statement to the police officer on the ground that “A is subject to the same offense,” and that “A is subject to the same offense,” and “A is subject to the same period of suspension of execution before the police station, on the same day and on the same day, the Defendant sent G to the police station, which was going to go through with the above E despite being operated by the police station, and was investigated as if he was unemployed in the above game room.” On the same day, the Defendant sent G to the police station, who was on the same day, and then sent the above G to the above G, which was before the police station, to the police officer of the above case.” However, the Defendant asked G to make a false statement to the police officer on the same day and around January 15, 2009, and let G make a false statement to the police officer of the above case.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with E to induce G to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect E by the prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning G and H;

1. Records of seizure;

참조조문

-사행행위 등 규제 및 처벌 특례법

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2015.06.11 2014고단3392

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.05.15 2013고단967

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.08.13 2013고단222

-청주지방법원 2015.10.02 2015고단1243

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2021.04.08 2020고단222 (1)