(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.08.13 2013고단222

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2013.08.13 2013고단222

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The evidence No. 17 of the pressure of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office, which was seized, No. 17 of the 2013.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act shall provide game products for distribution or use, or display or keep such products for such purposes, and exchange, exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase such tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products by a game products by a person who has violated the Game Industry Promotion Act;

On December 19, 2012, from around 14:00 of the same month to around 14:00 of the same month, the Defendant set up 7 game instruments for marine camping in the game without being classified by the Game Rating Board from the third floor, and provided them to the unspecified number of customers, and exchanged 10,000 won in cash per 10,000 won for the game money acquired by the said game machine.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified for use, and exchanged game money acquired through the use of game products for business purposes.

2. On December 20, 2012, at around 14:00 on December 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) committed an illegal business in the game room; (b) the Defendant had a criminal record prior to being punished by the operation of the game room; and (c) had D, which was attached to the game room, enter into an investigation into the game room’s business owner; (d) had D, who would be subject to criminal punishment in this case, deliver a fine on behalf of the owner of the game room; and (e) had D, who would be subject to the investigation into the unemployment week, made the said D make a false statement as if the game was unemployed in the above game room immediately after the control; and (e) had D, who was investigated at the Jinjin Police Station and the Living Order Office at around 15:55 of the same day, had the Defendant make a false statement as if the game room was an unemployment owner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. Each police statement of E and F.

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.07.12 2013고정322

-창원지방법원 마산지원 2013.02.20 2012고단765

-청주지방법원 2015.10.02 2015고단1243

-울산지방법원 2016.10.05 2016고단1953

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.10.30 2015고단713