1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The ground for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance was presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal as follows, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

The second part of the judgment of the first instance is referring to the defendant's "from the plaintiff" as "from the plaintiff."

The third and fifth witness in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be a witness in the court of first instance.

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance referred to the “instant contract” as the “instant contract for construction.”

The third and third parties of the judgment of the first instance consider the Defendant’s “Defendant” as the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff.”

The third party of the judgment of the court of first instance stated the phrase “a reasonable ground for the instant contract” in the 17 through 19th party of the judgment as “a reasonable ground for deeming that the Plaintiff permitted the use of a comprehensive construction business license and name so that D may perform the instant construction work in return for a certain amount of consideration from D.”

The third part of the judgment of the first instance is "the instant contract" as "the instant construction contract".

The sales contract concluded between the fourth and fourth parties in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “a written contract for a construction project in the name of the title.”

According to the conclusion of the judgment of the first instance court No. 3, "a written agreement prepared" shall be deemed "a written agreement prepared".

The fifth and sixth conduct of the judgment of the first instance is that "D shall pay the Plaintiff a license fee of KRW 25,000,000,000,000" to the Plaintiff in this court. The witness D of the first instance court shall be construed as "the license fee of KRW 25,00,000 to the Plaintiff."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.