logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.21 2015고정880
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High Court Decision 880] The defendant who violated the Automobile Accident Compensation Guarantee Act is a holder of B B B B B Bbeta car.

1. On April 23, 2011, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance, at the entrance of the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan Nowon-gu Nongdong, Gwangju, on the road.

2. On May 15, 201, around 10:36, the Defendant operated the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the entrance road of the Dong-gu Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-dong.

3. On July 7, 201, the Defendant driven the said car that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the upper speed of 155.2 km of the Honam Expressway on July 17, 2011.

[2015 High 881] On October 25, 2011, the Defendant made an investment of KRW 500 million to the victim’s “E” restaurant operated by the victim D located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, by investing KRW 500 million in the issue of stocks of the Mespo, and punished KRW 200 million. At present, the State holds KRW 52,00 per share of the issue of Mespoop for Mespo, which is 9,000 per share, and among which, the 500 shares are calculated as KRW 8,40 per share, more than the present market price.”

However, the defendant did not hold the acquired boops stocks and did not have the intention or ability to transfer them to the victim.

On October 26, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 4,200,000 won as a share price and acquired it through deception around 11:43, 201.

[2015 high-level 882] On July 13, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement that, at the office of the Korea FP (State) in the sixth floor of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant would pay money to the victim F because he/she would have lent money to the victim F because he/she would have to return to Korea.

However, even if the defendant borrowed the above money from the victim, he did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

In this context, the Defendant received 750,000 won from the victim to his account on the same day and received 750,000 won on July 17, 2013.

arrow