logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
orange_flag
(영문) 서울고등법원 2011. 12. 20. 선고 2011누21272,2011누21289(병합) 판결
[법인세부과처분취소][미간행]
Plaintiff, Appellant

Malsophan City Ltd. (Attorney White-gu et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)

Defendant, appellant and appellant

Head of Seodaemun Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 8, 2011

The first instance judgment

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2009Guhap37982, 2010Guhap45873 (merged) Decided June 10, 2011

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of claim

(1) The Defendant imposed corporate tax of KRW 144,351,540 on the Plaintiff on March 16, 2005; (2) imposed corporate tax of KRW 332,601,870 on March 28, 2006; (3) imposed corporate tax of KRW 2,212,420,00 on June 1, 2006; and (1,468,604,640 on corporate tax of KRW 1,640 on the business year of 2002, respectively.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Reasons

The court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Chang-suk (Presiding Justice)

arrow