logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.08 2020가단7284
동산인도 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the movable property listed in the attached list.

If it is impossible to execute the above duty of delivery.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It shall be as shown in attached Form; and

2. Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act);

3. Some of the dismissed plaintiff claims against the movable property listed in the separate sheet and claimed damages for delay against the subject claim at the same time when compulsory execution against the movable property is impossible. However, the subject claim is limited to the scope of the principal claim, and the subject claim cannot be deemed to have any delay of performance as a lawsuit for future performance in preparation for impossibility of execution in the future, and the time of delay in the future cannot be specified. Thus, the above claim for damages for delay is without merit.

arrow