logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.17 2014가단258968
제3자이의
Text

1. The Defendant (Appointed) and the designated parties, and the Defendants against the Nonparty Brodwa Partnership Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged as follows: (a) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant (Appointed Party); (b) Defendant Alh Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Alh Capital”); and (c) as a confession pursuant to Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act; and (c) between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant, Inc., the entire purport of the pleadings may be acknowledged in full view of the evidence No. 1-2, 3, and evidence No. 2-1, No. 2, and No. 3-1 through No. 5, No. 4-1, No. 5, No. 4-2, No. 5, No. 6, and No. 7.

Article 9 of the Seoul Gangnam-gu ground building is owned by Browabn & Partners Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Browab Partners”). Accordingly, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties, and the Defendants were subject to compulsory execution on the basis of each of the relevant titles listed in the attached Tables 1 through 5 of the attached Table 1 to Browab Partners.

B. At around April 2009, Brazilwab Partners transferred all equipment, such as the articles listed in [Attachment 2] List of the above building (hereinafter “the instant articles”) owned by it to Brazilwawea25 (hereinafter “Brobama25”) and transferred possession on April 10, 2009.

C. On June 30, 2009, as to the entirety of the equipment of this case, Defendant Ahovaga filed an application for compulsory execution with the Seoul Central District Court 2009No5070 on the basis of a promissory note 2009No.785 in the New and Joint Law Office on June 30, 2009, with respect to which a notary public applied for compulsory execution on the basis of a notarized promissory note 2009No.785, and accordingly, the compulsory execution procedure

However, the defendant (Appointeds) and the designated parties are employees of the BrAW Partners and are the list of the above parties based on the executive titles stated in No. 6 of the attached Table 1 concerning the goods, etc. of this case, with the right to claim wages, etc. against the above company as preserved rights.

arrow