1. The Defendant’s High Government District Court 2012Kadan40731 rendered its enforcement power against Jindi Co., Ltd.

The Plaintiff asserts that each of the instant corporeal movables listed in the Attachment List (hereinafter “the instant corporeal movables”) is owned by the Plaintiff and sought the Defendant’s refusal of compulsory execution against the instant corporeal movables based on the enforcement title against the Co., Ltd., Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Samerdi”). According to the respective evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to each of the instant corporeal movables listed in the Attachment List Nos. 2, 6, and 24 among the instant corporeal movables on January 16, 2014 can be acknowledged from C, and the fact that each of the items listed in the Attachment Nos. 3, 4, and 5 in the Attachment List Nos. 2 through 24, among the instant corporeal movables, was purchased from C and paid the purchase price. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to each of the instant corporeal movables listed in

However, in the case of the items indicated in the attachment list Nos. 4, 11, and 12 as to the items indicated in the attachment list No. 4, 11, and 12 as well as the images listed in the evidence No. 10-1, and 2 as to the above items, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff purchased the above items from a merdy. The Plaintiff’

Therefore, the part on each of the items indicated in the attachment list Nos. 2 through 24, which is owned by the plaintiff, among compulsory execution on each of the items listed in the attachment list based on the enforcement title against the defendant's execution title against the defendant's execution title, should be rejected. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be partly accepted within the above recognition scope,