Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasons why the court is to use for this case are as follows: Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the phrase “42 years of age” as “52 years of age” in Part 4, Chapter 15 of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.
[The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim of this case on the ground that there is insufficient evidence to acknowledge that there exists a proximate causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s business branch of this case and the Plaintiff’s business. The Plaintiff basically repeats the same argument in the first instance court, taking into account the allegations and the grounds that the Plaintiff partly supplemented in the trial, and subsequently adopted and investigated at the trial at the request of the Plaintiff at the trial, the results of fact inquiry on the Busan University University Hospital circulation D, Yangsan University Hospital Vocational Environment Department D, the Korean Metal Automobile Trade Union Department, the Hyundai Motor Trade Union Department of Hyundai Motor, the Hyundai Motor Corporation of Hyundai Motor Corporation, the U.S. Department of Environmental Safety and Health, are just in the first instance judgment as it is.