Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant C’s imprisonment for 10 months, Defendant B’s fine of 20,000, and Defendant D.
Reasons
Criminal facts
1. Defendant A
A. On December 22, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00 on the lower order of 22:00, the Defendant, within JM5-A car owned by the Defendant; (b) provided 100,000 won to the Defendant’s youth L (the age of 16) who was aware of through the “K”, a mobile phone-type display method; and (c) provided the Defendant with a single sexual intercourse to purchase the sex of juveniles.
B. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the same place as the above paragraph (a); (b) provided 100,000 won to the above L; and (c) provided a single sexual intercourse to purchase the sex of juveniles.
C. On January 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00, at the same place as the above paragraph (a); (b) provided 100,000 won to the above L; and (c) provided a single sexual intercourse to purchase the sex of juveniles.
2. Defendant B
A. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 03:00 at the early 03:00, in the MD car owned by the Defendant, parked in the ID parking lot located in H; (b) 120,000 won and 120,000 won to the above L, which was known through “K”, a mobile phone hosting display, and her sexual intercourse, and had the Defendant purchase the sex of juveniles.
B. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 01:00, at the same place as the foregoing paragraph 2-A; (b) provided 70,000 won to the said L; and (c) provided oral lectures, thereby soliciting juveniles’ sexual intercourse.
3. Defendant C: (a) around 02:00 on March 6, 2015, at the mutual influenite conference located in the Oral Doo-dong, Defendant C, who became aware of through K, a mobile phone hosting cream, provided 100,000 won to the above L, and provided a single sexual intercourse to purchase the sex of juveniles.
4. Defendant D: (a) around 17:00 on January 1, 2015, in the Nlearning car owned by the Defendant, which was parked in the IG parking lot located in H at the time of credit; (b) Defendant D 100,000 won for the foregoing L L, which was known through “K”, which was a mobile phone hosting display system, and 10,000 won for a single sexual intercourse to purchase the sex of juveniles.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning L;
1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the criminal facts;