1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

With respect to this case, the reasoning of this court is as follows, with regard to the reasons for the plaintiff's second argument, from 13 to 11 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and it is identical to the entry in the column of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance other than the entry as follows. As such, this part of the reasoning is accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Seoul High Court revoked the part against modern engineering among the judgment of first instance on February 10, 2015, "Seoul High Court has been pending in the appellate court as Seoul High Court 2013Na79502," and "Seoul High Court has revoked the part against modern engineering among the judgment of first instance on February 10, 2015, the plaintiff (the defendant in this case), the plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim added in the appellate court are all dismissed (Seoul High Court 2013Na79502, Seoul High Court 2015Da18266."

The part of the "A" of Forms 14 through 11 of the decision of the first instance shall be stated as follows:

First, we examine whether the contract of this case is null and void in violation of social order, since the contract of this case aims to make a special solicitation to the defendant's public officials in Creamland and the payment of the plaintiff's remuneration.

"When the recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award is contrary to the good morals and other social order of the Republic of Korea" under Article 36 (2) 2 (b) of the Arbitration Act, which provides for the grounds by which the court may ex officio revoke the arbitral award, is erroneous in the fact-finding conducted by the arbitrator.

(1) The term "arbitral Award" means any case in which the arbitral award may be deemed unreasonable because of a violation of a law or a legal judgment by an arbitrator, and means that the arbitral award violates the good morals and social order of the Republic of Korea

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2007Da73918, Jun. 24, 2010).