1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 15,00,000 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its amount from May 16, 2017 to December 18, 2019.

A principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed a principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is about 10 years of teaching with the plaintiff.

In March 2017, the relationship is the relationship between the former and the latter.

B. The Defendant was prosecuted for violating the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. with which the Plaintiff was the Defendant or the Plaintiff as the victim (hereinafter “Defendant’s relevant criminal litigation”), and the court of first instance (hereinafter “Cansan District Court Branch Branch Decision 2017No. 2110”), on October 30, 2018, did not repeatedly reach another party any codes, language, sound, sound, image, or motion picture that may cause fear or apprehensions through an information and communications network. However, the Defendant (referring to “the Defendant”; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), even if he/she did not repeatedly reach the other party on April 14, 2017.

The term “Plaintiff” means the “Plaintiff”;

For the purposes of this paragraph:

가 다른 남자를 만나는 것에 앙심을 품고, 휴대전화를 이용하여 피해자의 휴대전화로 '내가 너들그기서 얼마나 잘사는가 지켜보께. 바로 옆인데 진짜 뻔뻔하고 추접다.

Embre, Embre

(h) Dried paper

(e) bear no longer than a plosus;

from the time of sending the word "assigning", the same year

5. By the time of June, 16, letters and photographs that arouse fears fears or apprehensions through eight times in total, including each crime in the corresponding column of “crime List” were sent to the victim repeatedly.

“A” in violation of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and (2) “A” in this context, around May 4, 2017, the Defendant put the Defendant into the victim’s collection mail, and deleted the images and photographs of sexual intercourses with the victim, even if the Defendant did not have any interest in CC. (C.C.) as he did at least, as he did, and even if he did not look at as he did not fit, he is superior, long and well living. Moreover, even if he sent a photograph before sending it and remains, he does not remove the images and photographs of sexual intercourses with the victim.