The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the gist of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (unfair form of punishment), the fact that the defendant recognized the mistake of the defendant, committed contingent crimes, and supported the parents who have difficulty in economic aspects, etc., the sentence of the court below that sentenced the order to complete a sexual assault treatment program for eight months or 80 hours is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the motive and background of the instant crime, the circumstances before and after the instant crime, the degree of damage, and other various matters stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s character and behavior, environment, etc., as alleged in the grounds for appeal, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable because it is too unreasonable, considering the circumstances alleged in the grounds for appeal, even if it were to be considered in the grounds for appeal. In so doing, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unreasonable, as it is too unreasonable, since it was sentenced to six months of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts at Open Place) at the Seoul Central District Court on March 13, 2015.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.