Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2016, the Defendant did not open a well-known apartment door blocking machine for the victim D ( South, 70 years old) who is a security guard at the fixed guard room of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment house on September 23, 2016 at around 21:40.

It was damaged by putting one of the low-standing market prices on the floor, which is the victim's own.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the date of the second public trial, in the case);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged does not open a victim D (the remaining, 70 years old) who is a security guard at the front guard room of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment house C, around September 23, 2016, with a view to not opening a door blocking unit for the apartment house above this Pyeongtaek-gu apartment house.

The paragraph was used and assaulted in case of the victim's head.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. On April 7, 2017, after the prosecution of this case, submission of a written application for punishment that the victim D does not want punishment against the defendant

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;