The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is the fact that, at the time of the appeal, the Defendant stated that G in dialogue with F, the chairperson of the Korea Labor Union under the Korea Labor Union, “Korea Military Workers' Union Chungcheongnam-do Branch,” referred to as the “Korea Agricultural Union” as a democratic labor union. However, although the Defendant did not intervene in the organization or operation of the labor union by promising the convenience of distribution in the future and demanding the membership of the branch of the labor union under the above Korea Labor Union, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case by misapprehending the legal doctrine or by adversely affecting the conclusion of

2. The lower court recognized the following circumstances based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court: (i) the Defendant, as a volunteer employee of E, a representative director of D, was in office as a full-time director of D, and was in office in drivers’ boarding and dealing with accidents; (ii) on July 4, 2011, G began to work as the primary system from the aforementioned D (in principle, on a 25-day break-off working day after five days, in principle, on a 25-day break-off working day) and the Defendant was working for G, who was working for G to the effect that it would be “as if he did not participate in a democratic labor group,” on August 1, 201, and was working for the first time in the form of working (in principle, on a 13-day break-out working day, one day and 13-day working day), and was offered convenience by the Defendant to the Defendant’s labor union at the time of 16-day working time, and was required by the Defendant’s chairperson to leave Korea Labor Union at the same time.