1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant (the former trade name is the transportation company instead of the stock company; hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") is a company running the taxi transportation business, and the plaintiffs are the employees of the defendant.

B. The defendant around 200 entered into a wage agreement in 200 between the defendant's workers and the defendant's workers.

(2) Article 3 of the Wage Agreement of 2000 provides that the labor contract shall be based on a two-dimensional system in the form of labor (Provided, That it can be changed to a labor-management agreement).

(i) Working hours under Article 4: 06:00 to 14:20 p.m.: 15:20 to 23:40 (Provided, That working hours shall be one hour break a day and may be used at will by crew members.

(i) the number of monthly working days in Article 5 shall be 30 days and 26 full-time days (Provided, That two months shall be 24 full-time days).

Article IXTransport Revenues and Fuel Payments

1. Employees shall receive the full amount of taxi transport income in the company, and the daily minimum taxi income shall be 61,000 won in the morning and 62,000 won in the P.M.;

2. Fuel (LPG) shall be paid in 20 litress per day and 20 litress per 20 o'clock.

The term of validity of Article XIII shall be from May 1, 200 to that of this Agreement.

The amount (won) calculated in accordance with the classification 1651.8 of the Defendant’s wage table 1651.8 (hours 270,000 won / 30 days / 7.33 (hours) / 7.30 days / 7.30 days / 191 (hours) for continuous service allowances of 6,000 won x 6,000 won x 31.46,000 work allowances x 2,500 x 26 days/191 (hours) x 340.365,00 night work allowances x 1,651.8 won x 2 (hours) x 21,473 monthly allowances x 1,651.8 won x 7.33 (hours) x 107,100,000 won / 191 (hours / 192) / 30,50837,5370838.

C. The Defendant was a member of the Suwon-si Passenger Transport Business Council (hereinafter “Council”). Around July 2009, the Council organized a business negotiation group and made a joint negotiation proposal, and based on this, the Defendant’s workers demanded the negotiations with the Defendant.

Accordingly, on December 30, 2009, the defendant is not more than the Korean Taxi Industry Workers' Union.