logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2017.12.19 2017고단453
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on August 18, 2017, the Defendant was driving a D-low-scale car under the influence of alcohol with a 0.111% alcohol concentration from a section of about 1km from the common parking lot for the old underground passage, which is located in the occupation village of the Si/Gu, to the mother distance from the mother road located in the city of the Si/Gu of the Si/Gu of the Si/Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu of the Gu

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA motor vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes.

On August 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, such as Paragraph 1, around 01:00, while driving the car, and proceeded at about 110 km from the side of the Si/Gu Council of Gyeong-si to the front distance in the Si/Gu of Gyeong-si to the front distance in the Si/Gu of Gyeong-si.

There is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, and 40 km speed is 40 km per hour, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by complying with the speed and speed limit and operating the steering gear and brakes accurately.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a restricted speed exceeding 70 km per hour due to the influence of the above drinking, and received each of the following: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant neglected to drive the restricted speed in excess of 70 km; (c) due to the negligent negligence committed by the central line; (d) the Defendant’s fyst and other vehicles of the victim E (the 35-year-old); (c) the Defendant’s HM5-cab; and (d) the Defendant’s Ha (the 60-year-old) driving of the victim G (the 21-year-old).

Defendant 1’s occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim E of an incomplete natural heritage without any dysty typology and merger certificate that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment of the victim E, injury to the victim K (V, 36 years of age) who was on board rocketing and other automobiles together with approximately 2 weeks of treatment, injury to the victim G, such as a symphere and tension at the bottom of the syphere of the sypium in need of approximately 14 weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim G, such as a syphere, openness, etc. at approximately 3 weeks of treatment.

arrow