A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

b.2017 order 147

1. On March 25, 2017, at the D convenience store located in 06:00 on March 25, 2017, the Defendant interfered with his/her business, on the ground that the victim E (22) who is an employee is calculated first by calculating the last customer, and thereby, he/she is a large sound, “Chewing strings, rings, and inner strings;

In the latter phrase, the victim’s convenience store business operation was obstructed by the threat of about 10 minutes by avoiding disturbance, such as lowering the drinking water bottled by hand to the calculation unit of the drinking water.

b.2017 Highest 244

2. On April 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a Fran vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.138% in a section of about 500 meters, from around 06:25, to around the long distance in the central market located in the same Dong and located in the same Dong-si-si-dong, in a manner of under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.138%.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a Franchising car.

On April 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, as set forth in paragraph 2 of around 06:25, while driving the said car, and led the Central Market Scam on the road of the Sin-si in the parallel of the Sin-si to the right from the Sin-si under the jurisdiction of the Sin-si.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely according to traffic signals to those engaged in driving service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the front part of the Victim G(64) driving, which was going to the right side of the Defendant’s car, with the Defendant’s negligence of entering the red signal, in violation of the signal. The Defendant received the front part of the Victim G(64) driving that was going to the right side of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the said G, such as salt, tension, etc. of the species that require approximately three weeks of treatment on the part of the said G, on the part of the victim I (56 years of age) who was on board the said taxi, for about three weeks of treatment.