logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.02.21 2018고정787
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 24, 2017, the Defendant asserted that “CC is the one with whom the lender has any money, so that A office will be collapsed because there is no money.” If so, CC is the one with whom the money was received, the person related to Gangdong-gu Office’s Gangdong-gu Office’s Gangdong-gu Office stated that “The selection of a resident general meeting and a trust company prepared by C and the budget request of the residents’ general meeting (draft) are illegal.” The answer stating that “The cost expenditure for which the resident’s consent was not sought is not possible and illegal,” was made and distributed to the residents.”

However, there was no such assertion by the victim C, or there was no such a statement or answer by the person related to Gangdong-gu Office.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim's reputation by openly pointing false facts, and spread false facts at the same time interfered with the chairperson's duties of the committee for the promotion of reconstruction of the above apartment.

2. Around September 2017, the Defendant produced and distributed printed materials at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, “Ap Preparatory Committee and D’s intentional operation of construction cost, KRW 3.89,00 won in a project implementation plan, KRW 3.89,00 in a width of trust fees, KRW 4.33,00 in a project implementation plan, KRW 40,00 in a project implementation plan, and KRW 4.333,00

However, the victim C did not intentionally manipulate the construction cost.

As a result, the defendant injured the victim's reputation by openly pointing out false facts, and spread false facts at the same time interfered with the chairperson's duties of the committee for the promotion of reconstruction of the above apartment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Subparagraph 4 of the Management Committee of the Management Committee for the Reconstruction Improvement Projects of B Apartments (see, e.g., May 24, 2017), 'C Preliminaryer Meeting and D'.

arrow