beta
Text
1. The defendant, against the plaintiff A, KRW 26,617,268, and KRW 800,000 to the plaintiff C, and KRW 50,000 to the plaintiff D, respectively.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Defendant is the mutual aid association of the E-si (hereinafter “instant taxi”), and the Plaintiff is a person who suffered the following accidents, and the Plaintiff C is the wife of the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff D are the Plaintiff’s children.
B. On June 28, 2012, at around 8:30:00 a.m. on June 28, 2012, Plaintiff A was driving ahead of the road No. 47, Youngdo-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the two-lane side of the 63-lane building direction from the direction of Seoul intersection.
C. However, F is divided into yellow solid lines for the bicycle lane where Plaintiff A is running in the same direction as the instant taxi while driving along the two lanes in the same direction as the said bicycle. The bicycle lane between the bicycle lane and the aforesaid yellow solid lines has a distance of at least 30 centimeters, and among them, the instant taxi is constructed on the road to prevent the collision of the vehicle.
The plaintiff A was trying to find and operate the above taxi, but it did not put up a bicycle, and the part of the back part of the above taxi conflicts with the right side of the above taxi.
Due to the above accident, the cream of the bicycle on board the plaintiff A was displayed, and the plaintiff A suffered from the injury of the crypian part of the string line of the string line of the string line of the string line of the string line of the string line of the string line.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the facts of the recognition of the liability for damages, F, a driver of the instant taxi, does not allow the entry of a vehicle into the bicycle lane. However, F, a bicycle running along the bicycle lane, is negligent by automatically entering the vehicle beyond the yellow strawing line at the edge of the road, and the block to prevent the subsidence of the vehicle, and by automatically stopping the vehicle. Accordingly, Plaintiff A is above the above.