Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the insured of the East Life Insurance, and the victim C is an insurance solicitor of the above insurance.

On June 26, 2017, the Defendant, at the Epc room located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon around 18:30 on June 26, 2017, brought a dispute with the victim as a matter of the above insurance with regard to the above insurance, and brought about a mobile phone with the victim's face in his hand, 3 times, shaking his head debt, and shaking his head debt.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as pressure and hole on the left side, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (as at the second public trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;

1. Protocols made by the police against C, and protocols made to interrogate the police against C;

1. The defendant made a statement to the effect that he/she is credibility in the victim's statement, each photograph, recording CD [the defendant has credibility in the victim's statement, and the defendant made a statement to the effect that "the mobile phone used by the victim's victim's victim's victim's cell phone was recorded in the victim's body] at the time of investigation by the prosecutor's office (the victim's cell phone page 84). The circumstances at the time of confirmation by the recording file (the defendant called "the victim's voice" against the victim (the victim's voice 47 pages of the evidence record), and according to the victim's photograph (the evidence record No. 41-46 pages of the evidence record), etc. taken after the case, the fact that the defendant inflicted an injury on the victim can be fully recognized as facts charged, such as facts

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration of the fact that a person whose reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was to have forged and exercised a document under the name of the defendant, and that the defendant seems to have caused this case in the course of resisting the defendant, and that the degree of injury to the victim was not excessive.