(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고정809

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고정809

상해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 2, 2017, at around 18:00 on October 2, 2017, the Defendant viewed that the Defendant talks with the Defendant from the victim D (55 tax) in front of the C convenience store located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, to talk with the Defendant.

The written indictment for the sprinking of the victim’s flap, which is expressed in the sprinking of the victim’s flap in hand, is written as “sprinking, etc.,” and the written indictment for the sprinking of the victim’s flap, which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment by taking the body of the victim’s flaping, and undergoing approximately 2 weeks of treatment. The written diagnosis submitted by the victim (Evidence No. 24 of the evidence record) is written as “flaping and loss of dental appliances,” and the written indictment for the police interrogation of the victim’s police (Evidence No. 18 of the evidence record) is written to the effect that “the Defendant flaping of the victim’s flaping of the victim’s flap by taking the body of his flap, and flading the victim’s flap above the floor,” but it does not appear that the Defendant’s act related to this part is “ging”.

Therefore, only the part of the victim's injury related to the defendant's act as stated in the facts charged (the evidence record No. 39 pages) is indicated.

B. A.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of photograph, injury diagnosis certificate (Evidence No. 39 of the evidence record) of the person under consideration;

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the Defendant recognized the facts charged in the instant case; (b) the Defendant did not have any same criminal record other than twice a fine; and (c) the amount of fine imposed by the summary order issued for the victim who was summary prosecuted due to both assault, shall be reduced in part by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant recognized the facts charged in the instant case; (b

참조조문

-형법 제69조 제2항

-형법 제70조 제1항

-형법 제257조 제1항

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.12.06 2018노2145

-서울북부지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고정270

-부산지방법원 2016.04.08 2015노3854

-수원지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고정3060

-인천지방법원 2017.10.27 2017고정2316