A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

In order to raise living expenses, the defendant had invadedd on the restaurant with which he had worked before his towing, and sentenced to theft of cash, etc.

At around 02:30 on July 7, 2018, the Defendant, at “C” located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, completed the business of the Victim D, cut off with stones in the vicinity of the back door glass, opened a corrective device by hand, and intruded into the knife, and cut off with the cash owned by the victim and 80,000 won in cash and drinking water stored in the nife air conditioners, and cut off the market price due to the knife and drinking water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each investigation report (investigative cases of tracking routes of movement of suspects, and tracking and investigating cases due to escape of suspects);

1. Articles 331(1) and 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation have not been recovered. The punishment is determined as ordered by taking full account of various circumstances, including the following: (a) the current location of the offender was unknown; (b) there was no previous conviction for the same kind of crime and no criminal record for the suspension of execution; (c) the damage was relatively insignificant; (d) the Defendant’s chilled too high-frequency crime was committed without any income; and (e) the Defendant’s chilled by committing excessive high-frequency crimes; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime