The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, as witness, reported to 119, did not disclose that he was the driver of the accident, left the scene of the accident in this case, and it is difficult to see that the defendant was unaware that the accident in this case occurred due to himself, and the defendant was absent from the scene of the accident with the criminal intent of escape.

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving a freight of D 26 tons.

On March 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 19:20, and proceeded with the Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do, one-lane of the two-lane 0.6km at the Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, Ulsan-do, and the two-lane of the two-lane.

At the time, it is located at night and at the same time, and at the same time, it is an expressway that crosses the border and the Ulsan Expressway. In such a case, there was a duty of care to safely proceed by reducing speed for a person engaged in driving business and by checking the state of vehicles driving the said branch well.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 2차로를 진행하는 차량들의 상황을 제대로 확인하지 않고 2차로로 만연히 차선을 변경한 과실로 마침 2차로를 따라 진행하던 피해자 E이 운전하던 F 마티즈 승용차의 왼쪽 뒷부분을 피고인 운전 차량 오른쪽 앞부분으로 들이받아 그 충격으로 위 마티즈 승용차가 반시계 방향으로 회전하면서 피고인 차량 전방에서 약 40미터 튕겨나 중앙분리대를 충돌하고 계속하여 48미터를 더 미끄러져 전도하였다.

In the end, the defendant's negligence in the above negligence results in spawn spawnum spawn which requires treatment for about two weeks.