Text
1. 원고가 2017. 6. 7. 15:00경 부산 사하구 C 부근 D 앞길에서 E 포르테쿱 차량을 운전하던 중...
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
가. 원고는 E 포르테쿱 차량(이하 ‘원고 차량’이라 한다)의 운전자이고, 피고는 F 쏘렌토 차량(이하 ‘피고 차량’이라 한다)의 운전자이다.
B. Around 15:00 on June 7, 2017, the Plaintiff, while driving the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was waiting for signal at D in front of Busan Island C.
In front of the Plaintiff’s proceeding direction, the Defendant was the Defendant’s vehicle driven by the Defendant, but the Plaintiff continued to run a front door by changing the signal to a vehicle launch signal (green signal), and the Plaintiff incurred a traffic accident that shocks the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle to the front part of the front part of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).
C. On June 8, 2017, the following day of the instant traffic accident, the Defendant visited G Getype medical specialists to undergo a diagnosis of light salt accounts requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
The Defendant spent KRW 55,950 in total at the hospital costs for treating sculp salts, etc. The Defendant received KRW 55,950 in total from July 19, 2017 to June 20, 2018 (hereinafter “Mez fire marine insurance”), an insurance company that the Plaintiff joined,55,950.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Summary of the parties' arguments
A. At the time of the instant traffic accident asserted by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff stopped the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the instant traffic accident, but was trying to start with the signal change, and thus, the speed was slow. Since the Plaintiff immediately suspended operation after the accident, the instant traffic accident was insignificant.
Therefore, it is difficult to view that the Defendant, as the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, suffered injury to the extent that the Defendant should undergo hospital treatment due to the instant traffic accident. Even if the Defendant received hospital treatment after the instant traffic accident, the treatment act and the instant traffic accident are related to the instant traffic accident.