1. The Defendant’s KRW 117,904,584 as well as 5% per annum from January 25, 2012 to July 17, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 20:15 on January 25, 2012, B, the fact of recognition that the vehicle C is a vehicle for the Switzerland (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(B) On the other hand, the driver operated the vehicle and let the driver turn to the left from the front side of the water station at the front side of the water station at the water station at the Busan High-dong Busan High-dong Busan High-Road intersection. Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, the driver has a duty of care to drive the vehicle slowly and safely pursuant to the new subparagraph. However, even though the signal of the moving direction was already changed to the yellow signal on the left at the above intersection before entering the above intersection, even if the signal of the moving direction has already been changed to the yellow signal on the left, the driver left the left as it is in violation of the signal and was operated by the plaintiff, who was directly going to the left at the left side of the driving direction by the shipping station at the

The front wheels part of the Defendant’s vehicle was the front part of LA and HU, and the Plaintiff was injured. 2) The Defendant is an insurer which concluded an automobile insurance contract with the Defendant with respect to the Defendant vehicle B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 2, 3, 6, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, B, the driver of the Defendant vehicle, caused the instant accident by negligence and inflicted an injury on the Plaintiff, thus, is liable to compensate for the Plaintiff’s damage, and the Defendant, as the insurer of the Defendant vehicle, is liable to compensate for the Plaintiff’s damage along with B.

C. According to the evidence prior to limitation of liability, the Defendant’s vehicle is deemed to have caused the instant accident by going through the intersection in violation of the signal, but on the other hand, the Plaintiff’s vehicle intrudes the median line for overtaking the front vehicles, which are stopped according to the instant stop signal changed to the straight line at the intersection where the direction signal is changed to the straight line at the intersection.