1. The Defendants’ “liability Property” in attached Table 1 to the Plaintiff is within the scope of the inherited property indicated in attached Table 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 31, 2001, as indicated in the grounds for the claim, the non-party Fulldo Livestock Cooperatives made a loan of KRW 40,000 after entering into a loan transaction agreement with the non-party L, and the Plaintiff acquired the instant loan claim on December 30, 201, and notified the non-party L's heir of the fact of the said transfer of claim.

B. The Defendants: (a) died on January 25, 2003 and received inheritance according to the inheritance shares; (b) were inherited by their heir pursuant to the inheritance shares; and (c) the Defendants’ final inheritance shares are as indicated in the attached Table 2, as stated in the attached Table 2. The Defendants’ final inheritance shares are as listed in the attached Table 1.

C. The Defendants were tried to approve the inheritance of each inheritee’s property in succession from each inheritee.

[Ground of recognition] Defendant A, G, H, I, J, and K: The fact that there is no dispute (the above Defendants accepted all of the Plaintiff’s claims) (the Plaintiff’s claims) is written in Gap’s Evidence Nos. 1 through 38, Eul’s Evidence No. 1 (including the serial number), and a judgment by public notice of the purport of all pleadings (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant C, D, E, and F: Confession judgment (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the conclusion, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount indicated in the “amount of claim” column in attached Table 1 within the scope of property inherited from each decedent mentioned in attached Table 1.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.