A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The defendant shall obtain money from B who is an applicant for compensation, 1,835,00 won, and C who is an applicant for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 892] On June 24, 2018, the Defendant sent a notice to the effect that “pre-sale is made at the price discounted by 75% at the face value” by linking the Defendant’s dwelling at the Defendant’s dwelling at the Singuk-si, J, with “AdiL” at the K site, and then sent a letter to the effect that “the pre-sale is made at the price discounted by 73-75% at the face value” and that “the pre-sale payment shall be made at the price discounted by 73-75% at the victim’s mobile phone text message with defect in the victim’s purchase inquiry.”

However, as well as the above mobile merchandise coupons, the Defendant was thought to use them for the purpose of living expenses, etc. by receiving the sale proceeds from the victim, and there was no intention or ability to send the said merchandise coupons to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant made a false statement as above, and it was from June 24, 2018 to the same year from the victim.

7. From Jun. 24, 2018 to Jun. 24, 2018, the sum of KRW 4,307,000 in total as the sales proceeds of mobile merchandise coupons was transferred through the National Association (O) account in the name of the defendant, as well as the remittance from Jun. 24, 2018

7. Between 21.2 and 21. A total of KRW 38,198,00 was remitted from 12 victims as shown in the annexed sheet of crime.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims and received property.

[2018 Highest 1005] Around June 29, 2018, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “as soon as he/she first transfers money, he/she will send a gift certificate number later if he/she transfers money.” The Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “as soon as he/she first transfers money, he/she will sell it at a discounted price by using a smartphone at the Defendant’s residence in the Sinsi-si building and P, and that “as such, he/she will sell it at a discounted price.”

However, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to inform the victim of the gift certificates, even if he received money from the victim because he did not own the gift certificates.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.