logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.11.23 2017고단3474
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) even though the Defendant did not have D contact pockets together with C, the Defendant conspiredd to obtain money from the damaged party by means of selling D contact pockets as if he were to sell them to the Internet.

On February 22, 2016, the Defendant sold D contact pockets to the Internet Twitter in the residence of the accused in Youngcheon-si E on February 2, 2016.

The phrase “,” the victim F was written, and the phrase was in contact with the victim F, C would deliver 110,000 won to the victim via a mobile phone Kakao Stockholm case by transferring the amount to KRW 110,000 to the victim.

A false statement was made.

The Defendant was transferred KRW 110,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative (Serial H) account in G under the name of G in the name of the victim in the name of the container in the name of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, was accused of the victim and received property.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor alone was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the instant facts charged.

It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

A. C’s statement that the Defendant committed the instant crime with respect to C’s statement is difficult to believe it as it is for the following reasons.

1) The circumstances leading up to the commission of the crime asserted that C took part in the crime as the proposal of the Defendant and I (the Defendant’s female life), and that the enemy, who was bullyingd by the Defendant without any justifiable reason, took part in the crime at the same time without committing the crime with the Defendant, etc. (fore, five pages). However, there is any objective circumstance or evidence to acknowledge that C was seriously bullyingd by the Defendant or was in danger of such danger to the extent that C would not commit the crime with the Defendant.

arrow