1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff (mutual name was changed from the first D Co., Ltd. to E on October 25, 2002, and as of March 29, 2013, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is a corporation that runs the business of manufacturing, processing, and selling electrical equipment, electronic parts, and telecommunications equipment, and Defendant B is the chief researcher (class) of the Plaintiff’s Design Center who is in charge of air conditioners design-related business, and Defendant C is the representative of F Co., Ltd. who works for printing films and printing output.

B. Defendant B, as a design manufactured while in charge of air conditioners (frigerers) design-related work among the Plaintiff’s multiple business so that it is necessary to print and print the design in order to make the actual product, Defendant B recommended the Plaintiff the F operated by Defendant C, which is one of the same academic motive of the same university.

C. Accordingly, after concluding the first contract with F on February 19, 2009, the Plaintiff delegated F with F with the business of producing and delivering printed films and real output of design, from the end of December 2014.

(hereinafter “instant contract”). D.

On March 9, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendants on charges of occupational breach of trust, as stated in the facts constituting the offense of non-prosecution disposition in attached Form. On January 15, 2016, the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition of non-prosecution (hereinafter “instant disposition of non-prosecution disposition”). On February 12, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an immediate appeal against the instant disposition of non-prosecution disposition.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 15, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. From April 2009 to December 2, 2014, the Defendants did not have any relation with the printing films and real output, which are the contents of the contract between the Plaintiff and F, and did not have any business without having any actual details of transactions. They did not report to the Plaintiff or undergo the approval procedure, at will KRW 408,278,723.