A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, on March 9, 2012, 200, was transferred KRW 150,000 to the account of community credit cooperatives (F) in the name of the Defendant, i.e., the Defendant was an employee from the management office of the victim D in Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si as of March 9, 2012, as of “E operated by the victim D”. The Defendant, “If 1.5 million won is lent to B, 1.5 million won shall be repaid in full, by deducting 1.5 million won per month’s salary,” and immediately, as of June 25, 2012, received a remittance of KRW 1,500,000 from the account of community credit cooperatives (F) in the name of the Defendant.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim as above, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

As a result, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim D, obtained a total of KRW 7,500,00 through three times, and acquired a total of KRW 18,910,50 from ten victims, such as the statement in the attached crime list.

The Defendant called “Abandon 18:00 on January 3, 2011,” “Abandon 2011, the Defendant was transferred KRW 2.5 million on the same day to each of the Defendant’s accounts in the name of each of the following: “Abandon 18:00,000 won by phone calls to the victim G at an infous place; b) and “abandon 6.5 million won is required to loan to B; and (c) the Fund, which has been in the face of borrowing KRW 6.5 million, is to be repaid by terminating the Fund.”

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim as above, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to repay it.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds 6.5 million won in total.

around February 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the “J office” for the operation of the victim I in the window H of Changwon-si; (b) there was no permission from the said K on the application for the mobile phone opening in the name of the same student; and (c) tried to re-sale the mobile phone at the request for the mobile phone opening, and even if there was no intent to pay the mobile phone price or to pay the communications fee.