logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.05.28 2018나56643
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's grounds of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are to seek liability for damages based on illegal acts in violation of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works Projects, or liability for damages based on trust interest in preparation for concluding a contract, by not excluding obstacles, etc. from compensation, and thereby failing to pay reasonable compensation to the defendant. It is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is different from the evidence submitted in the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is that evidence submitted additionally to this court and it is insufficient to recognize the fact that the defendant granted trust in compensation due to the defendant's promise to compensate for the transfer of obstacles to the plaintiff or such speech and behavior, etc., Gap evidence Nos. 25-1, 26, and Gap evidence No. 26, and that "114,426,00 won" in the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "14,426,00 won", "this court" in the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "the first instance court", "2,00 won" in the third part of the fifth part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "3." In addition to the fact that the "J of witnesses" in the fourth part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "J of the first instance" and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow