1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim shall be dismissed by this court.

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning the instant case is as follows. The court’s explanation is as follows, and the reasoning of the first instance judgment is identical to that of the plaintiff, except for the case where the plaintiff makes an additional determination on the conjunctive claim added by this court. Thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of

2. The part to be added in height [Attachment] [Attachment] of the judgment of the court of first instance was completed on the ground of 305.2m2m2m2, Daejeon Tae-gu, Daejeon among the land of 2m2, the second 18, 19m2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the registration of preservation of ownership was completed on February 2, 2016.

1. The first instance court’s judgment on the first instance court’s first instance court’s judgment on the first instance court’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s “the first instance judgment on the second instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s “the second instance judgment on the third instance judgment’s first instance judgment.” The third instance judgment on the first instance judgment’s third instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s “the first instance court’s judgment on the second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance

“The portion” paid a significant portion of the interest on a loan obligation.

Da. The fourth 15th 15th tier of the judgment of the first instance is “Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, 7, 9, and 11 of “B” with “Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5 through 7, 9, and 11.” The fifth 28th 29th 15th 200 million won to the Plaintiff from September 15, 2015 to November 24, 2015, “the portion” was additionally remitted to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff deposited KRW 200 million to the Plaintiff on September 15, 2015, KRW 50 million on October 28, 2015, KRW 200 million on November 24, 2015, KRW 300 million on the Plaintiff’s wife, and KRW 1,500,000,000 on November 24, 2015.

The court of first instance additionally remitted KRW 15 and 16-200,000,000 from September 15, 2015 to November 24, 2015, and additionally paid KRW 220,000,000 from September 15, 2015.