logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.01 2017고단2635
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to two years of probation on June 29, 2016, due to interference with the execution of official duties in the Sungnam support by the Sunam branch of Suwon branch, and was sentenced to two years of probation on July 7, 2016, and is still under probation after the above judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Around April 15, 2017, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by publicly alleging that he was requested by the victim E (V, 61 years of age) who driven away from the Defendant without paying the food value after eating in front of the D cafeteria located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and received food costs from the victim E (V, 61 years of age) who driven away from the Defendant.

2. Intimidation Defendant received a report on the ground that it was done at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1, and received food costs from the Defendant and returned to the Defendant by arbitration by the police officer, and threatened the victim as if he were to enter the place.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as described in paragraphs (1) and (2) at the time, place, and in the manner described in paragraphs (1) and (2), committed assault against the said G by having a police officer’s control by insult and intimidation against the said victim, who continued to be dispatched to the scene of insult, and attempted to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender and to take aboard the police officer at the patrol station, such as G, etc., of Seoul, the police box affiliated with the Seoul, Sejong, the Police Station: (a) stated that “The young fare is equal to the farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb farb

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, investigation, and maintenance of order of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. A witness statement of H and I;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. The record of the offence: a written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, (A);

arrow