A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from October 13, 2015 to 05:30 on the same day, from around 04:00 to October 13, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by force by preventing customers who enter the convenience store by avoiding disturbance, such as drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, etc. to the victim E, an employee of the convenience store, who is an employee of the above convenience store.

"2016 Highest 353"

1. On January 31, 2016, the Defendant interfering with the business shall enter the G coffee shop located in F at the Government-Si around 14:30 on January 31, 2016, and shall have the victim H, an employee, to help make payments.

See the word “” and H whether “Chewing years” does not have any money; and Hashes, she has no money;

In the case of reporting to the police, it interfered with the victim's carpet business by force by driving the disturbance, such as hard, hard, hard, hard, haring, haring, and haring the har to customers who feel the disturbance.

2. At around 14:35 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was urged by J and K to return home from K in the process leading up to and leading up to the police station of the Kui Government Police Station that was called out after having received 112 reports in front of the said coffee shop; (b) the J and K expressed that “I am out of the night, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot, shot in the same year”; (c) the Defendant threatens to am in drinking while engaging in talking to read “I am out of the night, su,” and (d) the J and K boarding on the patrol.

Chewing gue, Chewing year, Chewing, Chewing, Chewing, Chewing, and Chewing, she expressed a desire to prevent the police officer from opening the door of the patrol car, and by threatening J and K in order to prevent the police officer from driving the patrol car at 15 minutes, thereby hindering the police officer from performing his/her legitimate duties in relation to the prevention of and patrol against the crime.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 4446]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each E and L statement;

1. The investigation report (the statement of a shot person) 1.