logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2013.04.18 2013고단31
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

As to the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at Busan District Court on July 26, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the port prison on December 5, 2012.

[2013 Highest 31] The Defendant is a person who is not entitled to handle psychotropic drugs, such as Mesophopon (one philopon; hereinafter referred to as “philopon”).

On December 31, 2012, at least 12:00, the Defendant received approximately 0.03g of oponononce of the C Terminal located in Daegu-gu without compensation from D, and performed the administration once by dilutioning the said oponon 0.03g of oponon 202 at around 23:00, around January 1, 2013.

"2013 Highest 68"

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Fedon vehicle.

On January 2, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license on January 2, 2013, and led to the driving of the said car on the front of the Hosan oil station located in the pentinari at the macro-city.

At all times, the right side is the length of bend and the right side begins, so there was a duty of care to see the front door in a clear mind and to operate the steering and steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant was found to have been in front of the defendant's vehicle, which was set up in the center line due to the negligence that did not accurately operate the steering gear.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the Central Separation Zone, which is the victim’s possession by occupational negligence as above, to be the repair cost equivalent to the market value of KRW 1,590,430.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, as a holder of Franchisa car, operated Franchisa car without mandatory insurance at the date and place specified in paragraph 2 above.

(i) the evidence;

arrow