1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Comprehensively taking account of the purport of each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 2 through 5 (including virtual number), the plaintiff was requested from the defendant to install a board and a happy zone around June 201, and installed a panel and a happy zone at the construction site of Songsan and Jinjin. The plaintiff paid the defendant the total amount of KRW 25,00,000 for supply price of June 23, 201, KRW 27,500,000 for total of KRW 27,500,000 for supply price of KRW 15,00,000 for supply price of KRW 1,50,000 for September 20, 201, KRW 1,50,000 for total of KRW 16,50,000 for construction price of KRW 16,500,000 for total of KRW 16,500 for construction price of KRW 80,000 for each of the above construction sites.

Since the defendant did not request the plaintiff to install double language, it is argued that the additional construction cost of KRW 4 million cannot be recognized. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit in light of the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively considering the purport of the entire arguments as a whole, i.e., the fact that there is no dispute between the parties, and the above additional construction cost of KRW 4 million was reflected and processed under the tax invoice issued in 2011, and the defendant seems to have not raised any objection against the above additional construction cost.

Next, the defendant has changed the size of 8,000 x 6,000 x 7,000 x 6,000 bit 6,000 bit 6,000 bit.