logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.10.07 2014나7668
사용료
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff alleged by the parties is a person who is engaged in the business of leasing kick equipment with the trade name of "C", and is a person who is engaged in the business of leasing kick equipment on March 27, 201, March 29, 2011;

4.4.2. 22. 11. 2. 6. 201. 6. 201. 5. 201. 6. 201. 4. 4. 201. 5. 1. 201. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. 20

In regard to this, the defendant also runs a business leasing equipment such as the plaintiff, and the defendant asserts that the defendant only introduced the work to the plaintiff when the work is requested in duplicate or the equipment is broken off, and that there is no fact that the equipment was leased from the plaintiff.

2. The reasoning of the judgment is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff leased equipment to the Defendant, as alleged by the Plaintiff, on the sole basis of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and witness D of the court of first instance, as alleged by the Plaintiff. There is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise. Rather, the Plaintiff asserts that the Defendant leased equipment to the Defendant five times from March 27, 2010 to October 6, 2012, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the arguments on the evidence presented by the Plaintiff, namely, the Plaintiff leased equipment to the Defendant on five occasions, and it is difficult to easily understand that the Plaintiff continued to lease equipment while not receiving equipment rent for about two years and six months; the certificate of the use of the construction machinery submitted by the Plaintiff did not have the Defendant’s signature; the Defendant’s signature was affixed to the confirmation of the construction machinery operated by the Defendant; and the Plaintiff leased equipment to the Plaintiff, other than the equipment leased to the Plaintiff.

It is nothing more than that of introducing users in need of equipment.

arrow