1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is operating a transport equipment leasing business, such as Scars, with the trade name of “C,” and the Defendant operates a lodging establishment in the trade name of “EMoel” (hereinafter “the instant telecom”).

Plaintiff

During the period from July 18, 2016 to August 24, 2016, the Switzerland (hereinafter “instant equipment”) owned by its owner is the instant construction project, including removal of external walls, paint, etc. of the instant cartel.

The sum of the cost of the use of the instant equipment was 7 million won to KRW 7050,000,000 to KRW 50,000,00; hereinafter referred to as "the royalty of this case").

2) In light of the above legal principles, the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s charge for the use of the equipment of this case, and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the Plaintiff’s charge for the use of the equipment of this case, and the Defendant’s direct payment of the equipment fee to the Plaintiff at the site of the instant construction.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 6 million, excluding the remainder of KRW 1 million already paid by the Plaintiff, among the instant usage fee of KRW 7 million to the Plaintiff.

The defendant asserted that he contracted the construction work of this case to F, and paid 16 million won in full to F.

The Plaintiff entered into a contract for the use of the instant equipment with the contractor F, and did not enter into a contract for the use of the equipment with the Defendant in connection with the said construction work or received an order from the Defendant for work.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

Judgment

The instant equipment was used in the instant construction, and the sum of the usage fees for the said equipment was 7 million won prior to the recognition, and the Plaintiff’s aforementioned usage fees from the Defendant on December 1, 2016.