Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at around 17:00 on September 12, 2017, at around 17:0, the Defendant 30 to 40 female residents on the identity in which he/she was living together in the top corridor of the elevator of 103, 103, and 1st floor, he/she was seated and divided into events; and (b) he/she gets out of her gender within the scope of 30 to 40, on

In other words, a patently obscenity was committed, such as committing an act of perjury.

2. On September 14, 2017, the Defendant, as the Defendant committed on September 14, 2017, does not look at the gender of a woman on the personal background, who sits in the event inside the E park located in P, P, P, P, P, 18:30 on September 14, 2017, and sees the gender of the Defendant.

In other words, a patently obscenity was committed, such as committing an act of perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Each investigation report and investigation report (Attachment to recorded data CDs at the time of committing the crime);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs and investigation reports (on-site inspection of the E Park);

1. Article 245 of the Criminal Act and Article 245 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. The Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects his mistake in depth.

There is no criminal record of the same sexual crime, and there is only a record of punishment by obstructing the performance of official duties once in 1991.

At present, the defendant suffers from a disease with unknown dementia that is accompanied by symptoms of recognition decline, scarcity, and net symptoms, and such disease seems to have affected the crime of this case.

In addition, in consideration of various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, living environment, and circumstances after the crime, and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the punishment shall be determined as ordered.