(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.24 2017노2057

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.24 2017노2057

명예훼손

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, has contracted the victim E with the pelumum salt.

There are no stories.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (an amount of two million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances admitted by the lower court based on the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, the Defendant may be found to have made a statement to the lower court that “E is infected with salt” as stated in the facts charged (hereinafter “the instant statement”).

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

① From an investigative agency to the court of original trial, D consistently and specifically stated the fact that the Defendant made the instant statement.

② E made a statement to the effect that the Defendant took part in the instant statement from D and D’s male-friendly arrestJ.

③ On March 23, 2016, four days after the instant case, in the currency between the Defendant and D, the Defendant dialogueed with D on the premise that there was a fluence against D on the grounds of the outbreak of the alleyum salt and the Internet.

④ The Defendant stated in the investigative agency that “E is in infinite relations with the E site warden or infinite finite finites, and there was a finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite.”

B. The Defendant made a statement of this case one-time at a different space with D regarding the determination of the unfair argument of sentencing.

In the process of pointing out that the employee's attitude in new employment is bad and that some of the employees are in in in in in a bad relationship, the Defendant.

유사 판례

-춘천지방법원 2016.08.11 2015노21

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.08 2017노1068

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.30 2017노3119

-춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.10.11 2018노211

-대구지방법원 2017.11.29 2017노4426