1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The plaintiff, the heir of the deceased C, "(the deceased C, the heir of the deceased C, and the plaintiff, AB, and AB, who are the heir of the deceased C, agreed on the division of inherited property owned by the plaintiff of the deceased C (the plaintiff, AA, the heir of the deceased C, and the plaintiff, AB, the plaintiff, A, and AB, who are the plaintiff of the real property of this case, can be deemed as the agreement on the division of inherited property, the claim for ownership transfer registration based on the completion of the prescription for possession of each of the real property of this case, which is owned by the plaintiff). The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the cases of subparagraphs 1 through 1

On April 9, 1975, the network AC and AD, which are the causes of the defendant clan, prepared a letter to the effect that the following drawings among D, D, D, D, D, D, D, a total of 111 square graveyardss, as owners of net AC and AD, shall continue to own the cemetery in the future, and at the same time, the purchaser shall inherit this intent when selling this land:

(E) The “E”, which is the location of the land indicated in the above letter, is obvious that it is a clerical error. In light of the form of the land attached to each of the following drawings, the following drawings are the real estate of this case and the neighboring real estate of this case, G, H, I, J, K, M, N, Q, Q, Q, R, T, T, U, L, L, L, and AF. Upon examining the contents and the drawings of the above letter, each of the above documents appears to have been prepared in order to ensure that the Defendant sells the real estate of this case and the neighboring real estate of this case to D, the sum of 111 square meters in possession of each of the real estate of this case, B, C, and C, together with the real estate adjacent to this case from the deceased C, D, and E. The Plaintiff’s assertion that each of the real estate of this case was occupied as an intention to purchase each of the real estate of this case.