1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant V: (a) each of the real estates listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 1 and 2, is 432,432/8,648.

1. The judgment on the claim against the defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, N, P, Q, Q, R, C, V, W,Y, Z, AB, AC, AE, AE, AF, AH, AH, AI, and AJ

A. The Plaintiff’s indication of the claim has purchased each of the real estate indicated in attached Form 1 “the indication of the real estate” owned by AK and possessed it in peace and openly and openly with the intent to own it for 50 years or more. Therefore, the period of prescription for acquisition by the Plaintiff’s possession of each

Therefore, Defendant V, the heir of AK, is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on April 22, 2013, with respect to each of the real estates listed in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the attached Table 1, 432,432/8,648,640 shares, which are inheritance shares, as of April 22, 2013. Defendant B, C, D, E, E, G, N, P, P, Q, Q, Q, T, T, U, V, V, W, Y, Z, AB, AB, AB, AE, AE, AE, H, AF, and AJ are obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on each of the real estates listed in the attached Table 1, 3, and 2, which are the heir of AK, due to the completion of the prescription period for acquisition of ownership due to the completion of possession shares in the final share in inheritance among each of the real estates listed in paragraphs 4, 3, and 4.

B. Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3)(i) of the Civil Procedure Act against Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, P, Q, R, T, u, T, W, Y, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AH, AH, AI, and AJ

C. Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act regarding DefendantO and V (a judgment by service by public notice)

2. The facts that the Plaintiff occupied each of the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 3 and 4 of the “Real Estate Indication” owned by AK for about 50 years, can be acknowledged by either the parties or by the overall purport of each of the entries and arguments in Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 25 (including each number number), and according to Article 197(1) of the Civil Act, the possessor is presumed to have occupied the real estate in good faith, parallel, and public performance with his/her own intent. Thus, the possessor is presumed to have occupied the real estate in good faith and public performance, at least on July 2018, which is the date of the final delivery of the application for modification of the claim of this case.