The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:00 on March 17, 2015, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim F (Nam, 46 years of age) who visited with E in relation to being cross-examination from the Economic Team Team of the Sinan Police Station, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chynam-gu, the Chy

Then, while the victim, “A few times of her death or her friend, becomes a mutual vision for the reason that he/she was committing a dispute,” the Defendant, who was in his/her possession of the Defendant, assaulted the victim’s face one time with his/her driver’s license, as follows: “The Defendant was in his/her possession of his/her driver’s license.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness G's statutory statement;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's assertion regarding the defendant's assertion of suspension of sentence under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the very minor degree of punishment) is alleged to be illegal as an act that does not go against the social norms, but it cannot be viewed as an act that does not go against the social rules in light of the circumstances leading to the crime according to the evidence in the judgment. Thus,